United Riggers Erectors v. Industrial Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• awarding benefits because incarceration was not voluntary removal from job market and there was no legislation taking away these benefits
• awarding benefits because incarceration was not voluntary removal from job market and there was no legislation taking away these benefits
• incarceration of employee neither excused him from complying with the requirements of the workers' compensation statutes nor precluded him from receiving benefits if he satisfied his burden of proof
• because Arizona Legislature did not enact any statute expressly prohibiting payment of disability benefits to incarcerated employees, the court held injured employee should still receive benefits because incarceration did not constitute voluntary removal from job market

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).