United Resource Systems, Inc. v. Meinhart (In Re Meinhart)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing term “educational benefit” in the context of holding for-profit lender not protected by section 523(a)(8)
• “[A] strictly for profit educational lender does riot qualify as a creditor which may exempt from discharge its claim against a student pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(8).”
• collectively, \the driving school cases\
• collectively, “the driving school cases”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).