United Products Corp. v. Admiral Tool & Manufacturing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying a motion to sever because defendants’ claims were “intertwined” and a partial transfer would require the same issues to be litigated in two places.”
• “In general, a court does not have personal jurisdiction over an individual defendant whose only contacts with the forum state were taken in his or her corporate capacity.”
• “Moreover, despite Rule 9(b)’s heightened pleading requirement, courts should be sensitive to its application prior to discovery, and the Rule may be relaxed somewhat when the factual information is peculiarly within the defendant's knowledge or control.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).