Skip to main content
· 6/29/2000

United Parcel Service, Inc., Petitioner/cross-Respondent v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/cross-Petitioner, David Dunning, Intervenor

Citations

  • 228 F.3d 772
  • 165 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2358
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 15803

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding designation of check-in area as “mixed-use” because that area “transformed into a congregation point for the drivers to drink coffee, read magazines and newspapers, and converse before their morning shift”
  • “[T]he NLRB has expressly found that a company may not prohibit the distribution of union literature in a mixed-use area, even though other non-work areas existed in the building”
  • discussing the same cases DHL relies on in its briefing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Siler, Gilman, O'Malley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.