Skip to main content
· 1/14/1997

United of Omaha v. Business Men's Assurance Company of America

Citations

  • 104 F.3d 1034
  • 20 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2353
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 508
  • 1997 WL 10253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that ERISA preempts-a state common-law subrogation claim in a dispute between two insurance companies over which company was responsible to pay for certain benefits
  • “The savings clause excepts from preemption certain categories of state law, including state law that regulates insurance.”
  • “The savings clause excepts from preemption certain categories of state law, including state law that regulates insurance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Wollman, Hansen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.