· 1/14/1997
United of Omaha v. Business Men's Assurance Company of America
Citations
- 104 F.3d 1034
- 20 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2353
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 508
- 1997 WL 10253
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that ERISA preempts-a state common-law subrogation claim in a dispute between two insurance companies over which company was responsible to pay for certain benefits
- “The savings clause excepts from preemption certain categories of state law, including state law that regulates insurance.”
- “The savings clause excepts from preemption certain categories of state law, including state law that regulates insurance.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Arnold, Wollman, Hansen
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.