Skip to main content
· 12/30/1982

United Nuclear Corporation v. Joseph E. Cannon, M.D., Etc., Conservation Law Foundation of New England, Inc.

Citations

  • 696 F.2d 141
  • 35 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 853
  • 19 ERC (BNA) 1429
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 22927
  • 19 ERC 1429

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that a presumption of adequate representation existed where the movants’ interests were no different in kind from and the litigation goal, of upholding the constitutionality of the statute, was aligned with a party to the action
  • seven month gap between filing of suit and motion to intervene permits finding of untimeliness
  • Conservation Law Foundation sought to intervene to defend Rhode Island nuclear power regulation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bownes, Brown, Coffin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.