Skip to main content
· 2/2/2009

United National Insurance v. Spectrum Worldwide, Inc.

Citations

  • 555 F.3d 772
  • 89 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1618
  • 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 1827
  • 2009 WL 224520

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating a district court may alter or amend a judgment under Rule 59(e) if presented with newly discovered evidence
  • stating the standard for altering or amending a judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e)
  • stating a motion under Rule 59(e) is 7 appropriately granted where “(1) the district court is presented with newly discovered evidence, 8 || (2) the district court committed clear error or made an initial decision that was manifestly unjust, 9 || or (3
  • “[J]udicial estoppel is an equitable doctrine [that] . . . . bars inconsistent positions taken in the same litigation . . . .”
  • “A denial of a motion for reconsideration under Rule 59(e) is construed as one denying relief under Rule 60(b) and neither will be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.”
  • \A denial of a motion 27 for reconsideration under Rule 59(e) is construed as one denying relief under Rule 60(b) and 28 neither will be reversed absent an abuse of discretion[.]\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pregerson, Smith, Collins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.