· 2/2/2009
United National Insurance v. Spectrum Worldwide, Inc.
Citations
- 555 F.3d 772
- 89 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1618
- 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 1827
- 2009 WL 224520
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating a district court may alter or amend a judgment under Rule 59(e) if presented with newly discovered evidence
- stating the standard for altering or amending a judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e)
- stating a motion under Rule 59(e) is 7 appropriately granted where “(1) the district court is presented with newly discovered evidence, 8 || (2) the district court committed clear error or made an initial decision that was manifestly unjust, 9 || or (3
- “[J]udicial estoppel is an equitable doctrine [that] . . . . bars inconsistent positions taken in the same litigation . . . .”
- “A denial of a motion for reconsideration under Rule 59(e) is construed as one denying relief under Rule 60(b) and neither will be reversed absent an abuse of discretion.”
- \A denial of a motion 27 for reconsideration under Rule 59(e) is construed as one denying relief under Rule 60(b) and 28 neither will be reversed absent an abuse of discretion[.]\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pregerson, Smith, Collins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.