United Mortgage Corp. v. Mathern (In Re Mathern)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• movant for summary judgment may rely on fact inference to satisfy statutory element of specific intent if it produces such “overwhelming” circumstantial evidence going to that element that no other reasonable inference is possible
• in order for complaining party to successfully challenge discharge under section 727(a)(4)(A), he must prove that the debtor made a false oath “in connection with his bankruptcy case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).