United Mine Workers of America v. Martinka Coal Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the district court abused its 22 discretion in granting summary judgment where a party had “adequately complied with the 23 requirements of Rule [56(d)].”
• finding the district court 19 abused its discretion in granting summary judgment where a party had “adequately 20 complied with the requirements of Rule [56(d)].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).