United Magazine Co. v. Murdoch Magazines Distribution, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting 8 plaintiffs’ claim that changes to their franchise agreements restarted the 9 limitations period
• rejecting Judge Lechner’s approach in determining when the thirty-day time limit begins to run under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b)
• rejecting, as unsupported by case law, plaintiffs claim that “changes to their alleged franchise agreements created entirely new agreements or restarted the [FSA] limitations period in some other fashion”
• “. . . a contract of indefinite term is capable of performance within a year only if there is an express provision for termination prior to the end of a year

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).