Skip to main content
· 3/11/1986

United Jersey Banks v. Parell

Citations

  • 783 F.2d 360

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding no federal jurisdiction will lie under the well-pleaded complaint rule even if a federal right is available to plaintiff but not asserted in the complaint
  • finding no federal question existed because right to relief under state law did not require resolution of a substantial question of federal law
  • finding no federal question existed because right to relief under state law did not require resolution of a substantial question of federal law
  • finding no federal question existed because right to relief under state law did not require resolution of a substantial question of federal law
  • discussing how the first exception is a reaffirmance of the traditional well-pleaded complaint rule
  • reversing district court’s decision that federal jurisdiction existed based on artful pleading doctrine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.