United Iron Works v. Hurley Mason Co.
Citations
- 71 Wash. 275
- 128 P. 209
- 1912 Wash. LEXIS 734
Syllabus
<p>Damages — Injury to Property — Evidence—Sueeiciency. It is error to grant a nonsuit in an action for damages to property, where it appears that defendant wrongfully took possession of new machinery without the consent of a conditional sales vendee, after being informed of plaintiff’s title, and afterwards delivered it to the plaintiff in a worn out condition by reason of abuse and use; and it is not necessary that plaintiff show the exact damages alleged in the complaint.</p> <p>Actions — Conditions Precedent — -Demand. Demand is not a condition precedent to an action for damages to property wrongfully taken without the consent of the owner.</p> <p>Evidence — Parol Evidence — Ownership oe Personal Property. Title to personal property may be shown by parol evidence.</p>
Judges: Fullerton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.