United Independent Flight Officers, Inc. v. United Air Lines, Inc., and Air Line Pilots Association, International

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing, among other things, that the petitioning party bears the burden of satisfying each of the requirements set forth in Rule 23(a)
• United breached no fiduciary duty in administering the plans in accordance with the terms of the Supplemental Agreement.
• “No named plaintiff is a member of subclass 2 alone.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).