United Hydro-Carbons Co. v. Texas Pacific Coal & Oil Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Heck applies to Section 1983 conspiracy
• holding that dismissal under Heck is without prejudice.
• “claim [that] sounds under Brady v. Maryland . . . does indeed call into question the validity of [the] conviction”
• dismissal under Heck is without prejudice because the suit may be reinstituted if the criminal proceeding is overturned
• “Vacatur is required even where the court’s ruling simply ‘mak[es] a connection not established by the complaint alone’ or contains an ‘unexplained reference’ that ‘raises the possibility that it improperly relied on matters outside the pleading in granting the defendant’s Rule 12(b
• determining plaintiff’s Brady claim was barred by Heck

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).