United Handicapped Federation v. Andre

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remand for failure to consider new regulations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cannon v. University of Chicago
  Supreme Court· 1979-05-14· cited 2,763×
• Sue De La Cruz v. James Tormey
  Ninth Circuit· 1978-09-13· cited 166×
• Rhea Dopico v. Neil E. Goldschmidt, Disabled in Action v. Neil E. Goldschmidt
  Second Circuit· 1982-09-02· cited 86×
• Thomas Davis v. United Air Lines, Inc.
  Second Circuit· 1981-09-17· cited 44×
• Riley v. Ambach
  E.D. New York· 1980-07-01· cited 12×
• Smrcka Ex Rel. Smrcka v. Ambach
  E.D. New York· 1983-01-24· cited 7×
• Razorback Cab of Ft. Smith, Inc. v. Flowers
  Eighth Circuit· 1997-09-04· cited 3×
• Jane Doe v. New York University
  Second Circuit· 1981-11-24

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• George A. Lloyd and Janet B. Wolfe, Etc. v. The Regional Transportation Authority and the Chicago Transit Authority
  Seventh Circuit· 1977-01-18· cited 171×
• United Handicapped Federation v. Andre
  Eighth Circuit· 1977-06-21· cited 68×
• United Handicapped Federation v. Andre
  D. Minnesota· 1976-03-11· cited 8×