United Gamefowl Breeders Ass'n of Missouri v. Nixon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “[t]hese [single subject] requirements apply to initiative 33 proposed constitutional amendments found in article III, section 50, and article XIII, section 2(b
• rejecting argument that pre- election review under chapter 116 is the exclusive way to challenge an initiative measure
• rejecting the argument that pre-election review under chapter 116 is the exclusive way to challenge the constitutional form of an initiative measure
• rejecting argument that pre-election review under chapter 116 is the exclusive way to challenge an initiative measure
• stating a proposed constitutional amendment has “one subject if all of its provisions are properly connected with a central purpose”
• stating this principle with regard to Section 116.334.1’s 100-word limit for summary statements prepared by the Secretary of State

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).