United Fuel Gas Co. v. Adams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “party witnesses (and their employees) . . . normally must appear voluntarily as part of their employment”
• explaining that although cases arose under federal law, “it would be inefficient for two Courts to invest the time learning the facts common to both [cases] and then applying” the law to those facts
• discussing these and other advantages of coordinating parallel class actions in a single district
• “[T]he material events are not where customers made their purchases—a similar factual pattern that may have repeated itself across airports nationwide, in light of the multiple pending class actions.”
• “While transfer to the Southern District of Florida may not be warranted by looking to the convenience of the parties and witnesses alone, transfer is warranted to enable this case to be coordinated or consolidated with the similar Legg class action.”
• “While transfer to the Southern District of Florida may not be warranted by looking to the convenience of the parties and witnesses alone, transfer is warranted to enable this case to be coordinated or consolidated with the similar Legg class action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).