United Food & Commercial Workers Unions, Employers Health & Welfare Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing ―that the requirements of proximate cause are relaxed—to some degree—in intentional tort cases‖ but concluding that ―the usual (Continued
• recognizing “that the requirements of proximate cause are relaxed—to some degree—in intentional tort cases” but concluding that “the usual (Continued
• claims for fraud, conspiracy, breach of assumed duty were barred by doctrine of proximate cause
• “The usual common law rule is that a health-care provider has no direct cause of action in tort against one who injures the provider's beneficiary, imposing increased costs upon the provider.”
• “The usual common law rule is that a health-care provider has no direct cause of action in tort against one who injures the provider’s beneficiary, imposing increased costs upon the provider.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).