United Food & Commercial Workers Local 204 v. Harris-Teeter Super Markets, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the union lacked standing to bring a claim under section 1132(a) because it was neither a participant nor a beneficiary
• “This Court holds that the Union lacks standing as a plaintiff under [ERISA § 502(a)(3)] because it is neither a participant nor a beneficiary of the Plan.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).