United Fire & Casualty Co. v. Boring & Tunneling Co. of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding as matter of law that notice lacking notary signature and seal was not deficient when evidence presented that omission was clerical error, statement was sworn, corrected statement was sent, and surety had timely actual notice
• “As a result, case law has established that adherence to notification deadlines requires strict compliance, but substantial compliance is adequate for the other notice provisions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).