United Feature Syndicate, Inc. v. Miller Features Syndicate, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting Canadian website owner's extraterritoriality defense because infringing material posted on the site was viewed in the United States
• requiring “specific facts” under Rule 9(b) to support a veil-piercing claim
• movant “failed to demonstrate that application of Canadian law would be unusually difficult or burdensome to this Court.”
• “[T]he exact limits of what constitutes a fiduciary relationship are impossible of statement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).