· 5/23/1994
United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. v. Metropolitan Human Relations Commission
Citations
- 24 F.3d 1008
- 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 11915
- 1994 WL 200125
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that creation of a local civil rights agency was made possible by the Indiana Civil Rights Act
- rejecting notion that FHA did not extend to white person harmed by discrimination or segregation caused by insurance redlining
- “The federal Fair Housing Act applies to discriminatory denial of insurance as well as discriminatory refusal to renew insurance that effectively precludes ownership of housing on the basis of race....”
- when a case is removed to federal court, jurisdiction is determined \by looking at the complaint as it existed at the time the petition for removal was filed.\
- “[i]t is a fundamental principle of law that whether subject matter jurisdiction exists is a question answered by looking to the complaint as it existed at the time the petition for removal was filed.”
- “To succeed on [his substantive due process] claim, Gerhart must first demonstrate that he was deprived of a constitutionally protected property interest. We hold that Gerhart cannot make this threshold 25 showing.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lay, Cudahy, Kanne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.