Skip to main content
· 5/23/1994

United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. v. Metropolitan Human Relations Commission

Citations

  • 24 F.3d 1008
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 11915
  • 1994 WL 200125

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that creation of a local civil rights agency was made possible by the Indiana Civil Rights Act
  • rejecting notion that FHA did not extend to white person harmed by discrimination or segregation caused by insurance redlining
  • “The federal Fair Housing Act applies to discriminatory denial of insurance as well as discriminatory refusal to renew insurance that effectively precludes ownership of housing on the basis of race....”
  • when a case is removed to federal court, jurisdiction is determined \by looking at the complaint as it existed at the time the petition for removal was filed.\
  • “[i]t is a fundamental principle of law that whether subject matter jurisdiction exists is a question answered by looking to the complaint as it existed at the time the petition for removal was filed.”
  • “To succeed on [his substantive due process] claim, Gerhart must first demonstrate that he was deprived of a constitutionally protected property interest. We hold that Gerhart cannot make this threshold 25 showing.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lay, Cudahy, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.