United Erectors, Inc. v. Pratt & Lambert Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure allowing interlocutory relief from order sustaining personal or in rem jurisdiction
• diseussing Pennsylvania Rule of Appellate Procedure allowing interlocutory relief from order sustaining personal or in rem jurisdiction
• Unambigous language of Rule 311(c) and comments thereto make plain that it applies only to lower court orders which do not sustain venue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• CSR LTD. v. Link
  Texas Supreme Court· 1996-08-16· cited 815×
• Canadian Helicopters Ltd. v. Wittig
  Texas Supreme Court· 1994-06-15· cited 498×
• Constantino v. University of Pittsburgh
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-01-04· cited 23×
• Richardson Brands, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Dutch Co.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1991-06-03· cited 10×
• Centerre Bank of Kansas City v. Arthur Young & Co.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-12-27· cited 6×
• Todd Enright v. Asclepius Panacea, LLC Asclepius Panacea GP, LLC Daily Pharmacy, LLC Daily Pharmacy GP, LLC And Toth Enterprises II, P .A. D/B/A Victory Medical Center
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2015-08-24

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• City of Philadelphia v. Franklin Smelting & Refining Co.
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-08-20· cited 5×
• Adkins v. Empire Kosher Poultry, Inc.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-11-04· cited 2×