United Egg Producers v. Standard Brands, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that court enforcement of a settlement agreement is not state action for constitutional purposes
• holding that there is no state action for constitutional purposes where \a court acts to enforce the right of a private party which is permitted but not compelled by law\
• holding that there is no state action for constitutional purposes where “a court acts to enforce the right of a private party which is permitted but not compelled by law”
• noting that judicial enforcement of private agreements does not constitute state action unless there is \finding that constitutionally impermissible discrimination is involved\
• noting that judicial enforcement of private agreements does not constitute state action unless there is “finding that constitutionally impermissible discrimination is involved”
• “[T]he reach of Shelley remains undefined outside of the racial discrimination context.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).