Skip to main content
· 1/12/1926

United Dredging Co. v. City of Los Angeles

Citations

  • 10 F.2d 239
  • 1926 A.M.C. 426
  • 1926 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 927

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying Turner and Thornburgh to regulation barring involves a modicum of consent to regulation that is not prison guards from marrying prisoners
  • applying Thornburgh v. Abbott to claimed First Bazzetta, 123 S. Ct. at 2167-689 (citations omitted
  • upholding rule preventing jail employees from marrying inmates out of security concerns
  • “[S]o far as challenges to prison regulations as infringing constitutional rights are concerned, the standard is the same whether the rights of prisoners or of nonprisoners are at stake.”
  • “[S]o far as challenges to prison regulations as infringing constitutional rights are concerned, the standard is the same whether the rights of prisoners or of nonprisoners are at stake.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: James

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.