United Distribution Companies v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Windward Energy & Marketing Company, Intervenors

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding petition for review ripe in part because agency had demonstrated that it did not intend to reconsider the relevant ruling or amplify its justifications for the ruling in further proceedings
• granting petitioners relief “insofar as the Commission stated . . . that any change to injection and withdrawal schedules can be effected without a § [717f(b
• granting petitioners relief “insofar as the Commission stated . . . that any change to injection and withdrawal schedules can be effected without a § [717f(b
• regulatory flexibility analysis provision applies only to \small entities that are subject to the requirements of the rule\
• regulatory flexibility analysis provision applies only to \small entities that are subject to the require- ments of the rule\
• “The existence of a second reasonable course of action does not invalidate an agency’s determination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).