United Construction & Development Corp. v. Pontiac Apartment Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that, where the last day of the original limitations period was August 20, 1997, and the claimant filed her notice on August 19, 1997, she had “waited until the last possible day to file her notice of claim with the City before the running of the limitation period”
• \This court is obliged to give full effect to the plain language of the statute even when the results of doing so may seem unduly harsh.\
• “This court is obliged to give full effect to the plain language of the statute even when the results of doing so may seem unduly harsh.”
• where claim notice was filed on August 19, 1997, and October 17 and 18 were identified as “day 59” and “the 60th day,” day 1 was August 20
• \It is undisputed that Sievers waited only 59 days after filing her tort claim with the City before commencing her suit in superior court.\
• “It is undisputed that Sievers waited only 59 days after filing her tort claim with the City before commencing her suit in superior court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).