United Cigar-Whelan Stores Corp. v. Philip Morris, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the upshot of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii) with respect to party witnesses is ... that a court is not required to quash a properly served subpoena even if it required a party witness to travel more than 100 miles”
• reasoning, “based simply on the text of Rule 45(b)(2)” and “the terms of Rule 45(c)(3)(A)(ii),” that the majority view that a party witness may be properly served with a subpoena beyond the 100-mile limit does “not logically follow from the text of’ Rule 45

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).