United Capital Corp. v. Sapolin Paints, Inc. (In Re Sapolin Paints, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• despite assignees having paid estate $2,600,000 for assignment of avoidance causes of action, court found no benefit to estate
• “The reasons [for not allowing assignment of preference actions] are self-evident: The power to avoid a preference is one which is to be exercised in the interests of securing equality of distribution among creditors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).