· 7/24/1984
United Business Communications, Inc. v. Racal-Milgo, Inc.
Citations
- 591 F. Supp. 1172
- 224 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 148
- 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14704
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- discussing that a fraudulently obtained judgment is not entitled to preclusive effect
- discussing that a fraudulently obtained judgment is not entitled to preclusive effect
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: O'Connor
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.