Skip to main content
· 7/24/1984

United Business Communications, Inc. v. Racal-Milgo, Inc.

Citations

  • 591 F. Supp. 1172
  • 224 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 148
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14704

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing that a fraudulently obtained judgment is not entitled to preclusive effect
  • discussing that a fraudulently obtained judgment is not entitled to preclusive effect

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: O'Connor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.