United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local No. 1780 v. Desert Palace, Incorporated, D/B/A Caesars Palace Las Vegas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• opining that the Supreme Court’s observation in First Options that “there is no strong federal policy favoring arbitration of commercial disputes, does not apply in the collective bargaining context”
• stating “federal labor policy strongly favors the resolution of labor disputes through arbitration” (emphasis added
• asserting “there is no strong federal policy favoring arbitration of commercial disputes,” but there is “a strong federal policy favoring arbitration of labor disputes” (first and third emphasis added)
• “As our precedents hold, a broad arbitration clause—even one that does not specifically mention who decides arbitrability—is sufficient to grant the arbitrator authority to decide his or her own jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).