Skip to main content
· 8/22/1968

United Bonding Insurance Company v. Castle

Citations

  • 444 P.2d 454
  • 1968 Alas. LEXIS 146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • a bonding company’s response to an interrogatory that it had furnished a bond precluded it from challenging the validity of the bond at trial
  • presumption arises that bond required by statute has been provided
  • affirming jury discretion in determining amount of damages

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nesbett, Dimond, Rabinowitz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.