United Blue Flame Oil Stove Co. v. Silver & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• listing cases noting the “obvious tension” between the standards of Rules 15(a) and 16(b)
• granting leave to amend, despite finding lack of diligence sufficient to support good cause under Rule 16(b)
• permitting amendment of answer where movant failed to demonstrate good cause, but the case was still in the early stages of discovery
• discussing interplay between Rules 15 and 16 in motions to amend
• discussing interplay between Rules 15 and 16 in motions to amend
• granting defendant's motion to amend after finding no undue prejudice to plaintiff where, at the time the motion to amend was filed, expert reports were not exchanged, no motions for summary judgment were pending, and several months remained before discovery closed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).