Skip to main content
· 9/4/2007

United Automobile Workers Local 259 Social Security Department v. Metro Auto Center

Citations

  • 501 F.3d 283
  • 41 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1830
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 21084
  • 2007 WL 2472237

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the lodestar calculation applies to entries of default judgment
  • noting that the “starting point for determining the amount of a reasonable fee is the lodestar calculation,” which is “the reasonable number of hours expended on the litigation multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • “§ 1132(g)(2) was enacted to encourage employers to make timely contributions, assist plans in their recovery of delinquent contributions, and discourage excessive litigation by defendants”
  • “Because the focus is on the ‘degree of success,’ and not success as defined in absolute numbers, this comparison [of the damages award to the fees requested] does not necessitate proportionality.”
  • “[W]e emphasize that the adverse party’s submissions cannot merely allege in general terms that the time spent was excessive.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted) (alteration in original)
  • “Because the focus is on the ‘degree of success,’ and not success as defined in absolute numbers, this comparison [of the damages award to the fees requested] does not necessitate proportionality.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sloviter, Chagares, Greenberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.