United Automobile Insurance Company v. Iso-Diagnostics Testing, Inc. a/a/o Suryma Pineiro Morales

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, “in computing jurisdictional amount, a claim for punitive damages is to be given closer scrutiny, and the trial judge accorded greater discretion, than a claim for actual damages” (citation omitted)
• en banc denied, 4-3, i. e. 4 in favor of en banc, 3 against
• en banc denied, 4-3, i. e. 4 in favor of en banc, 3 against
• en banc denied, 4-3, i. e. 4 in favor of en banc, 3 against
• en banc denied, 4-3, i. e. 4 in favor of en banc, 3 against
• “[T]he trial court is plainly not compelled to accept a claim of punitive damages . . . made for the purpose of conferring federal jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).