United Automobile Insurance Co. v. Salgado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that insured’s failure to list his brother as a member of the household was a material misrepresentation that “provided [the insurance company] with grounds to rescind the policy”
• granting certiorari on second-tier review of circuit court appellate division per curiam affirmance
• “[A]n insurance company has the right to rely on an applicant’s representations in an application for insurance and is under no duty to further investigate”
• “[W]here a misstatement or omission materially affects the insurer’s risk, or would have changed the insurer’s decision whether to issue the policy and its terms, [section 627.409] may preclude recovery.”
• “[W]here a misstatement or omission materially affects the insurer’s risk, or would have changed the insurer’s decision whether to issue the policy and its terms, [section 627.409] may preclude recovery.”
• “[Wjhere a misstatement or omission materially affects the insurer’s risk, or would have changed the insurer’s decision whether to issue the policy and its terms, the statute may preclude recovery.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).