United Artists Theatre Circuit, Inc. v. The Township Of Warrington, Pa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recalling that the core concept of due process is protection against arbitrary action and only the most egregious official conduct
• holding land use decisions violate substantive due process where governmental conduct “shocks the conscience”
• noting that a prior “panel did not decide [an issue] . . . because the issue was raised by the panel on its own at argument and was not briefed by the parties . . . .”
• “our cases have repeatedly acknowledged that executive action violates substantive due process only when it shocks the conscience.”
• “our cases have repeatedly acknowledged that executive action involves substantive due process only when it shocks the conscience.”
• “our cases have repeatedly acknowledged that executive action violates substantive due process only when it shocks the conscience.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).