United Artists Corp. v. Strand Productions, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that a person carrying a large number of blank money orders of small denominations, $1,000 and under, could raise suspicions of criminal activity
• noting that an overnight detention “could not possibly be justified” based on reasonable suspicion
• noting that an overnight detention “could not possibly be justified” based on reasonable suspicion
• noting that “the new forfeiture procedures apply only to proceedings commenced on or after [CAFRA’s effective date]” (citing United States v. 221 Dana Ave., 261 F.3d 65, 67 n.1 (1st Cir. 2001))
• explaining that claimants need not “ultimately prove[] the existence of” their claimed interest
• affirming forfeiture rulings that first adjudicated Fourth Amendment challenges to search and seizure of property at issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).