United Airlines, Inc. v. Mesa Airlines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding fraud claim by commuter airline Mesa against airline United preempted because Mesa did not seek to enforce United’s self-imposed agreement with Mesa but, instead, sought to change parties’ bargain by applying state law to agreement and extract damages from United
• “When all a state does it use [rules against force and fraud] to determine whether [a contractual] agreement was reached, ... it transgresses no federal rule.”
• considering similar language in the Airline Deregulation Act of 1978

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).