United Air Lines, Inc. v. International Ass'n of MacHinist & Aerospace Workers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that union’s bulleting exhorting members to “work safe” was a commonly recognized signal among union mechanics for a work slowdown
• holding that a union has an obligation to discourage or prevent a slowdown despite the union’s contention that it did not initiate the slowdown or have a legal duty to end it
• holding that a union has an obligation to discourage or prevent a slowdown despite the union’s contention that it did not initiate the slowdown or have a legal duty to end it
• reiterating that statistical evidence alone is not enough to provide clear proof of a union’s involvement in a work action
• finding that statistical evidence plus union bulletins prominently telling members to “work safe” established clear proof of union’s involvement in work slowdown
• reiterating that statistical evidence alone is not enough to provide clear proof of a union’s involvement in a work action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).