Unite Here v. National Labor Relations Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reviewing for substantial evidence the question of “whether the stock award is so tied to remuneration that it is in fact a part of it”
• finding substantial evidence to uphold the Board’s decision when the Board “majority acknowledged that [an employment-related] factor might cut against treatment of the stock award as non-bargainable, but concluded that this factor was outweighed by other considerations”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).