Skip to main content
· 8/9/2010

Unite Here Local 26 v. Taj Hotel Boston

Citations

  • 731 F. Supp. 2d 95
  • 2010 WL 3155807

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing 18 as immaterial arbitrator’s belief that he lacked jurisdiction to clarify the amount due without the 19 parties’ consent and noting that a district court has jurisdiction in Section 301 actions to resubmit 20 the matter to the original arbitrator
  • when an arbitration 9 award requires reinstatement and back pay, and the parties cannot agree on the amount of back 10 pay, the matter should generally be remanded to the original arbitrator to clarify the award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Patti B. Saris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.