Skip to main content
· 3/20/2012

Unitas Containers Ltd. v. Oilnet Ltd.

Citations

  • 848 F. Supp. 2d 1358
  • 2012 WL 949846
  • 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 37258

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying summary judgment as to retaliation claims under Law Nos. 17 and 69, given that record showed genuine issue of fact as to the Title VII retaliation claim
  • disregarding additional facts provided by plaintiff when plaintiff did not include a separate section of additional facts, instead, she proposed additional facts in the same numbered paragraphs wherein she admitted, denied or qualified defendant’s proposed factual statements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.