Unisys Corp. v. South Carolina Budget & Control Board Division of General Services Information Technology Management Office

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that exhaustion of remedies precludes original resort to courts where an administrative agency is granted exclusive jurisdiction by the express terms of a statute
• holding that when a dispute is not as to the underlying facts but as to the interpretation of the law, and development of the record will not aid in the resolution of the issues, it is proper to decide even novel issues on a motion to dismiss
• holding transactions under the Consolidated Procurement Code are exempt from the UTPA
• noting that, “[a]s a general rule, important questions of novel impression should not be decided on a motion to dismiss” unless development of the record will not aid in the resolution of the issues
• holding transactions under the Consolidated Procurement Code are exempt from the UTPA
• examining the language of the statute to determine the legislative intent regarding exclusive jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).