Unisys Corp. v. Legal Counsel, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that under Complaint that meet Texas law, there is a duty to disclose this standard. when “1
• providing that under Texas law a duty to disclose arises if the speaker made a misrepresentation “that he knew was false when he made it or that he made recklessly as a positive assertion without any knowledge of its truth”
• applying Georgia law on motion to dismiss, allegations that defendant failed to disclose intrinsic quality that could not have been discovered plausibly alleged duty to disclose
• dismissing the plaintiff’s MMWA claims because his state law breach of warranty claims were dismissed, and “‘[t]he [MMWA] does not provide an independent cause of action for state law claims’”
• applying the common law of other states to a fraudulent concealment claim
• safety defects were material facts for which a duty to disclose existed under Georgia law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).