Uniram Technology, Inc. v. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff had “offered 28 circumstantial evidence sufficient to create a genuine issue of 1 fact for trial” on a trade secret misappropriation claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).