Unique Sports Products, Inc. v. BABOLAT Vs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the February 13, 2001 registration of a trademark did not operate against uses of that mark that began prior to the mark's registration
• holding that the February 13, 2001 registration of a trademark did not operate against uses of that mark that began prior to the mark’s registration
• describing “a charge of fraud in the procurement of a trademark” as a defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).