Skip to main content
· 4/10/1981

Unionamerica Mortgage & Equity Trust v. McDonald

Citations

  • 626 P.2d 1272
  • 97 Nev. 210
  • 1981 Nev. LEXIS 483

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that an unjust enrichment claim requires a plaintiff to show that the plaintiff conferred a benefit on the defendant, which the defendant appreciated, accepted, and retained \under circumstances such that it would be inequitable for him to retain\ without payment
  • stating that an unjust enrichment claim requires a plaintiff to show that the plaintiff conferred a benefit on the defendant, which the defendant appreciated, accepted, and retained \under circumstances such that it would be inequitable for him to retain\ without payment
  • stating that an unjust enrichment claim requires a plaintiff to show that the plaintiff conferred a benefit on the defendant, which the defendant appreciated, accepted, and retained \under circumstances such that it would be inequitable for him to retain\ without payment
  • stating that an unjust enrichment claim requires a plaintiff to show that the plaintiff conferred a benefit on the defendant, which the defendant appreciated, accepted, and retained \under circumstances such that it would be inequitable for him to retain\ without payment
  • stating that “unjust enrichment” is modern counterpart of quasi-contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.