· 4/10/1981
Unionamerica Mortgage & Equity Trust v. McDonald
Citations
- 626 P.2d 1272
- 97 Nev. 210
- 1981 Nev. LEXIS 483
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that an unjust enrichment claim requires a plaintiff to show that the plaintiff conferred a benefit on the defendant, which the defendant appreciated, accepted, and retained \under circumstances such that it would be inequitable for him to retain\ without payment
- stating that an unjust enrichment claim requires a plaintiff to show that the plaintiff conferred a benefit on the defendant, which the defendant appreciated, accepted, and retained \under circumstances such that it would be inequitable for him to retain\ without payment
- stating that an unjust enrichment claim requires a plaintiff to show that the plaintiff conferred a benefit on the defendant, which the defendant appreciated, accepted, and retained \under circumstances such that it would be inequitable for him to retain\ without payment
- stating that an unjust enrichment claim requires a plaintiff to show that the plaintiff conferred a benefit on the defendant, which the defendant appreciated, accepted, and retained \under circumstances such that it would be inequitable for him to retain\ without payment
- stating that “unjust enrichment” is modern counterpart of quasi-contract
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.