Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Southern Traction Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was a jury question as to whether insured 16 reasonably relied solely on a 17–page fax as containing all of the terms of its insurance contract and in failing to review the actual policy mailed to it on two occasions
• holding that a jury question was presented as to whether it was reasonable for insured to rely solely on a 17-page fax as containing all of the terms of its insurance contract and in failing to review the actual policy mailed to it on two occasions
• holding that a jury question was presented as to whether it was reasonable for insured to rely solely on a 17– page fax as containing all of the terms of its insurance contract and in failing to review the actual policy mailed to it on two occasions
• “[T]he doctrine of reasonable expectations has evolved to apply to cases . . . in which a policy provision on which denial of coverage is based differs from 5 the prior representations made to the insured by the insurer.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).