Union Trust Co. v. Carter

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “the question of whether a putative class member was a Dish customer at the time of a call should be a simple and objectively verifiable task, requiring little more than reference to Dish’s own records.”
• “Ascertainability only requires that a court be able to identify the class members in reference to objective criteria.” (cleaned up)
• “EBR is a defense for [defendant] to prove, and the absence of an EBR is not an element of a TCPA claim that [plaintiff] has to prove.”
• “Predominance . . . does not require all issues to be common.” (cleaned up)
• “EBR is a defense for [defendant] to prove”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).